Internet Explorer banned from European version of Windows 7


“European buyers of Windows 7 will have to download and install a web browser for themselves,” according to this BBC News article, published today. “Bowing to European competition rules, Microsoft Windows 7 will ship without Internet Explorer”. Internet Explorer 8

This, it would seem, is another victory for the European Commission and it’s competition rules. Microsoft has previously fallen foul of these in early 2008 when it was fined £765m by the European Commission for ‘anti-competitive behavior’: including Windows Media Player and Internet Explorer with Windows. Understandably then, it has decided to avoid that kind of financial pain again by bowing to the pressure.


Why does it matter what Microsoft choose to ship with Windows? It’s not like I have to pay for Internet Explorer, or any other browser by any other vendor, for that matter. So I, the consumer, am not losing out by it’s inclusion in the operating system.

Internet Explorer, like Windows Media Player, are features designed to make the operating system better, easier to use and increase the overall value of the product. Browsers should be features of every operating system.

Every major consumer-targeted operating system has it’s own browser included. Let’s take Apple’s Mac OS, for example: that ships with the Safari browser. Safari and IE browsers do essentially the same thing, and they are distributed to the consumer in exactly the same fashion: automatic inclusion by the vendor on to the newly purchased computer. Yet, Apple aren’t the target (so far as I know) of the EC competition rulings because they aren’t the market leader.

To impose this type of ruling on Microsoft because they are the market leader seems very similar to saying that Microsoft are the market leader because of Internet Explorer, which isn’t true at all. So surely, if you’re going to impose this type of rule on any vendor then surely you must apply it to all of them: that’s really the only way to give consumers a free, fair choice, right?

What’s the difference?

I assume that the EC are interested so much in Microsoft’s activities because it holds the majority market share. So too, then, I would assume it to be equally interested in Nokia, who according to this article, held 40.43% of the Mobile Device market share in Q12009, making them the market leader. Are Nokia the subject of an EC competition rules enquiry for bundling their own software with their device?

I can’t see much practical difference either, between companies like Dell and HP, who pre-bundle their own proprietary software programs and utilities onto the PC’s they ship, and this, either. Perhaps the EC will go after these companies under their ‘anti-competition’ rules, too.

Ultimately, it comes down to education

Eight or 9 times in 10, most users don’t care what browser they’re using: at least in my experience. Most consumers just want something that works. They don’t care what it is, why should they? I certainly don’t get all shirty when my new car comes with Michelin tyres, or Goodyear, or – who cares… they do the job.

But my point is, if I do want something different, I’m free to change those tyres. Perhaps I’ll read that Pirelli tyres are better than my Goodyears, and I’ll change them. Just as I can change my browser, any time I want to. And I don’t need the EC to make that happen for me because Microsoft haven’t prevented me from using Firefox, or any other browser, for that matter. And that’s the point: this is about education. Those who know enough to understand why they might want another browser, and can make a comparative choice, are completely free to do so, and (if I do say so myself) it is ridiculously easy to swap to an alternative.

I can’t say the same about the tyres on my car though (the ones I’ll have to pay a hefty cost to change). Thankfully, swapping my browser is free and easy. And that’s another reason why these confusing rules make me, well, confused.

It’s all down hill from here…

Now, when Windows 7 ships in Europe, what on earth will the majority of consumers do? What will Microsoft do, in order to help users make the choice that’s right for them? Will consumers see a choice of browsers pop up on their screen? How will they choose? Why should they have to choose? Does Mr And Mrs Average really care? Please comment!


About these ads

5 thoughts on “Internet Explorer banned from European version of Windows 7

  1. Andy Garcia

    I don’t know whats the deal with some of you hating on IE. When I see some1 saying IE is buggy or what ever like if it was a video game I laugh cause Ive never seen anything like that with my IE9. I guess you oldfarts must be referring to the old IE6 or something cause IE7, 8 and 9 were all great for me. Yes before that when all we had was IE6 I use to have other browsers….but now? why the hell for? When ever I click it it opens fast, takes me to where I want to go and it works in harmony with everything in my pc. Not to mention that most browser games like Heroes and Generals and so on only support IE and Im a gamer so…nope. To me being a fraction of a second faster is not important. Browsers have very little importance in my life.

  2. mp

    wait, this will make people angry because you need a browserb to install another browser.

    all the ignorent people will wonder what happened to ‘the inernet’ or ‘the big blue e’

  3. Erick

    Of course most people don’t care what browser they use “as long as it works” problem here is IE browser is horrible and does not work when it should, it’s the buggiest piece of crap resource hogging slow turd. If people would just take the time to experince another browser it would open their eyes to why “Internet Explorer has occured an error” and needs to close.

  4. This was related to the case won by Europeans that one should not be forced to choose any particular explorer. One should have choice than having the default one.

    So now Windows will be having a choice page (ballot screen) first for European versions, which will show all leading explorer to choose from … and then the consumer will be needed to download and then go.

    By default, Internet Explorer will be disabled and could be chosen to get installed from windows component, I guess.

    Its a news from mid of December and such Windows versions are expected to arrive by March 2010.

  5. DataCabbitKSW

    The label as being “banned” is a bit misleading. It just has been removed from the Windows 7 E (European) editions. I have been seeing posts to the fact that discs of IE8 might be given out to retail buyers of Windows 7 in the EU. For system builders, it is a no brainer to just install a browser or two before shipping out the machines. Even on the international releases and in the Windows 7 RC (build 7100) you can choose not to install IE8 at all if you choose to customize your installation, and it will never grace your system if you so choose.
    I do agree with you in that most people don’t care which browser they are using as long as it works. The ones who do care, can easily obtain another browser and use it. Safari, Opera, Chrome, FireFox, even Lynx are easy to get and install on most systems. This may be another case of what happened with Windows Vista N (which shipped without any of the Windows Media Player or MediaCenter extensions), users will largely not buy the crippled version, or they won’t care about the difference.

Comments are closed.